Log In | Register
CASH
In my other life I am a Formula One race car driver who solves mysteries on TV
Articles Posted: 107; Links Seeded: 1010
Member Since: 8/2006
Member Since: 8/2006
18 Votes
31 Comments
A new reason she'll deny you oral sex - she might get throat cancer
News Type: Event — Seeded on Thu May 10, 2007 11:16 AM EDT
Article Source: Scientific Bloggingadvertisement
Researchers have conclusive evidence that human papillomavirus (HPV) causes some throat cancers in both men and women.
Oral sex, including both fellatio and cunnilingus, is the main mode of transit for oral HPV infection, the investigators say.
Published to:
- Cash's Column, All of Newsvine
- Groups: none
- Regions: none
- Public Discussion (31)
What's this?
Who's leading the conversation?
This visualization below allows you to see the impact that each user
has on the current conversation.
The top row contains the group of users who have had the most impact, the 2nd
row the group of users who have had the 2nd most impact (et cetera).
Users with similar impact are grouped together, and the average score of the group
is shown to the left of the group. The author of the article is also shown on the
left, in their corresponding group.
Each user's score is based on the number of comments the user has made plus the
number of votes their comments have received. The scores are calculated relative
one another, so while their absolute value is not particularly important, their
relative difference does indicate a larger difference in impact on the conversation.
49
14
{"commentId":697639,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
Take that, "cigars will give you cancer" shills. Sex can too.
Throat cancer, though? I am betting most of you are not reaching anyone's throat, though scientists probably give women lung cancer.
{"commentId":697639,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 5 votes
#1 - Thu May 10, 2007 11:18 AM EDT{"commentId":697665,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
So, statistically, Cash, what are my chances of getting throat cancer (wonders if the chance increases with number of encounters?) compared to winning the lottery or getting hit by lightening? Is this something else that has a genetic component?
Ah, what the hell. You only live once. LOL Bring it on, boys. LOL
{"commentId":697665,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 5 votes
{"commentId":697734,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
You have a 1 in 10,000 chance per year of getting any kind of oral cancer so the chance of getting the throat-specific kind - even if you are a porn star - is pretty low.
On the other hand, you have a miniscule 1 in 620,000 chance of getting hit by lightning per year.
So if your choice is being a porn star or playing golf during a thunderstorm ... be the porn star. 1 in 10,000 is still pretty remote and a lot more fun than being struck by lightning.
{"commentId":697734,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":697821,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
So if your choice is being a porn star or playing golf during a thunderstorm ... be the porn star. 1 in 10,000 is still pretty remote and a lot more fun than being struck by lightning.
Or choice three, be an fat old woman who causes the odd man to spout gibberish for several minutes. :D
{"commentId":697821,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":698451,"authorDomain":"mayother"}
Granted, I've been around for about 30 seconds, but when I saw this article earlier today, I thought: "It looks like something that guy Cash would seed."
{"commentId":698451,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"mayother"}
- 6 votes
#2 - Thu May 10, 2007 4:14 PM EDT{"commentId":699377,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}
You learn fast!
{"commentId":699377,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":699381,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
Don't encourage that sort of insolence.
{"commentId":699381,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":698488,"authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
The key factor is this: *multiple* oral sex partners. Not enormous amounts of oral sex. More proof that God intends for men to be monogamous. (Women just naturally are....)
{"commentId":698488,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
- 3 votes
#3 - Thu May 10, 2007 4:28 PM EDT{"commentId":698653,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
The key factor is this: *multiple* oral sex partners.
I know women who have gotten diseases from their first and only lover. There are no guarantees in life.
Not enormous amounts of oral sex. More proof that God intends for men to be monogamous.
::gags:: Have you read the Old Testament? Just work your way through the book of Genesis. Except MAYBE for Adam, and Jewish tradition says otherwise, the rest had multiple wives or concubines.
(Women just naturally are....)
Um . . . I would LOVE to see your data on that. Because according to Family Law, Estimates reveal that almost 33 percent of men who have taken DNA tests are found not to be the biological father of the child.. Perhaps the male myth is that women are "faithful", and male violence against females who follow their natural instincts is great enough in some times and places to keep it to a minimum, but new studies show that women are genetically programmed to cheat.
Hell, if you believe in the Bible, the Mother of God cheated on her fiance. What better example could women want than that?
{"commentId":698653,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":699323,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
More proof that God intends for men to be monogamous.
Nic, granted, this may be only my opinion, but what the heck are you talking about man, are you cracked? This may be the craziest talk I ever heard....!
*chokes, hacks*
*deep breath*
{"commentId":699323,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":699330,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
*calms down somewhat*
Unlike Gwenny, I'm still far too worked up and my hands are shaking too much to be able to create links, so I can't put my finger right on it, but the most current research that I've seen says that even female songbirds are relentless sluts, and the farthest thing from monogamous.
It turns out that monogamy is almost always not an evolutionarily viable strategy.
And I say this as someone who has made a serious commitment to married, monogamous existence, but who is likewise aware every minute that he is committing a crime against nature....
{"commentId":699330,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":699340,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
what the heck are you talking about man, are you cracked?
Nik is a girl. I missed it, too. :D
{"commentId":699340,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":699343,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
And I say this as someone who has made a serious commitment to married, monogamous existence, but who is likewise aware every minute that he is committing a crime against nature....
Bah! Monogamy is for folks who are afraid they can't get laid by more than one person. LOL
{"commentId":699343,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":699348,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
I score it Synthesis 85, Gwenny and Nic -6.
Nice work, Synth.
Men rule!
{"commentId":699348,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 1 vote
{"commentId":699362,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
Except MAYBE for Adam,
Gwenny, unless I mis-remember, even Adam was a cheater. Seems to me that his first wife was a babe named Lilith, but she turned out to be too domineering for him, so he started to sneak around with that ever-accomodating Eve.
Hmmm. Sounds like just about every other infidelity account I've ever heard of. Heck, I bet that snake was actually Joey Greco!
{"commentId":699362,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":699369,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
...And Cash, as usual, you're too kind (but I'll accept your ruling in the name of gender solidarity). In self-assessment, as I look back at my comments, it occurs to me that I may have come across just a teensy eensy bit too animated.
And I think I did know that Nic was a female. I'm going to argue a) that I was just too worked up to think straight and/or b) that I was using 'man' in the proto-hippy non-gender-specific sense (see also "dude").
{"commentId":699369,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
- 1 vote
{"commentId":699382,"authorDomain":"sbutki"}
Gwenny
The key factor is this: *multiple* oral sex partners.I know women who have gotten diseases from their first and only lover. There are no guarantees in life.
Not enormous amounts of oral sex. More proof that God intends for men to be monogamous.
::gags:: Have you read the Old Testament? Just work your way through the book of Genesis
I nominate "gags" as the most unfortunately chosen word for your argument
{"commentId":699382,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"sbutki"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":699449,"authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
Whattya mean, unfortunate?
Seems apropos to me...
{"commentId":699449,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PrimarySources"}
- 2 votes
{"commentId":699598,"authorDomain":"belarius"}
There's a joke to be made about Clerks here, I just know it...
{"commentId":699598,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"belarius"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":701635,"authorDomain":"2timothy42"}
The key factor is this: *multiple* oral sex partners. Not enormous amounts of oral sex. More proof that God intends for men to be monogamous. (Women just naturally are....)
I am not really sure this study "proves" that, but I definitely agree with your statement. It's nice to see some others on here that feel the same way I do - I got hammered in another post the other day making similar statements - but there is a part of me that likes it - hence the reason I stick around ;-)
{"commentId":701635,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"2timothy42"}
- 1 vote
{"commentId":701681,"authorDomain":"gwenny"}
It's nice to see some others on here that feel the same way I do
You'll be disappointed then, when you read further down that she was fishing for controversy and this may not actually be her pov.
{"commentId":701681,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"gwenny"}
- 1 vote
{"commentId":698509,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
Mayother, that sort of prescient knowledge of people ( read: me ) is uncanny in its impressiveness. You get a Cash Star award for assuming that every science article related to sex was either written by or placed into circulation by me. Actually, anything with 'me' in it is generally good.
Nic darling, is is possible to compromise and have enormous amounts of oral sex with one partner???
And what's up with this shot at manhood?
More proof that God intends for men to be monogamous. (Women just naturally are....)
No one seeded this article: New study says male infidelity is 'inevitable' and I won't now because Mayother already thinks I am a perv.
But you can! Girls always do well submitting articles that slam men.
{"commentId":698509,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 6 votes
#4 - Thu May 10, 2007 4:37 PM EDT{"commentId":699091,"authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
LOL, I just make stuff up Gwenny. I LOVE your response. Thanks ;)
{"commentId":699091,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
- 2 votes
#5 - Thu May 10, 2007 9:55 PM EDT{"commentId":699098,"authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
But I did get the "multiple" partners from the original article....
{"commentId":699098,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
- 1 vote
#6 - Thu May 10, 2007 9:56 PM EDT{"commentId":699107,"authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
Yes, Cash darlin'. Enormous amounts....one partner.
And slamming men is something I do so well.....;)
{"commentId":699107,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
- 2 votes
#7 - Thu May 10, 2007 10:01 PM EDT{"commentId":699352,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
And I was all 'heh heh ... slamming ... she means sex' ... and then I saw the article you seeded.
She means slamming, folks.
{"commentId":699352,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 5 votes
{"commentId":699368,"authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
You're right on both counts, hon. ;)
{"commentId":699368,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"NicOfTime"}
- 4 votes
{"commentId":699467,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
Well Cash this may be one of the first times you find value in my science perspective. The HPV is naturally occurring and in healthy immune systems it is destroyed as a routine part of the body's attack on invasive threats. The actual problem with the HPV comes in the small number of situations when the immune system can't destroy the HPV and not all of those become cancerous.
There's a lot of hype to sell yet another high priced vaccine to treat something that rarely occurs. If fact if health were the main goal they would look instead for ways to improve the immune systems for those few who can not naturally fight the virus. My own theory is that growing inability to destroy this HPV is tied to the virus promoters in the gmo foods. The more the bodies adapt to tolerating virus varieties, the better chance for some bad stuff to be accepted by a messed up immune system. Fear sells and while there's a pinch of truth there's huge pay day for the vaccine.
{"commentId":699467,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
- 5 votes
#8 - Fri May 11, 2007 1:53 AM EDT{"commentId":699515,"authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
Pamela, you're basically saying oral sex should continue unimpeded ... and efforts to stop it are a big business conspiracy??
You earned yourself a pie today!
{"commentId":699515,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"scientificblog"}
- 8 votes
{"commentId":701996,"authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
I had a feeling, that a pitch for a naturally balanced immune system, in this context, was a winner.
{"commentId":701996,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"PamelaDrew"}
- 3 votes
{"commentId":699573,"authorDomain":"chill888"}
I get the humor
News this morning a poor guy (former captain of England Football/Soccer)
diagnosed with throat cancer. This kicks a guy when he is down.
yes - i get the humor - not complaining
{"commentId":699573,"threadId":"101987","contentId":"711405","authorDomain":"chill888"}
- 4 votes
#9 - Fri May 11, 2007 4:06 AM EDT{"canLink":false,"threadId":"101987","isPrivate":false}
You're in Easy Mode. If you prefer, you can use XHTML Mode instead. |
As a new user, you may notice a few temporary content restrictions. Click here for more info.
Start Tracking
Stop TrackingCOMPANY STUFF:
LEGAL STUFF:
- © 2005-2009 Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine® is a registered trademark of Newsvine, Inc. |
- Newsvine is a property of
